"Eagle Eye" is what everyone strives to be in tennis.
Here is what a coach would look like if he actually had eagle eyes.
As officials, its always exciting when a collegiate coach informs us that we are "blind as a bat" and have missed the call because he/she has seen it clearly (on the far sideline) and we should take their word for it--the ball was good!
All that sounds well and good, but it just ain't true. It is physically impossible for a person standing on a sideline to see the far sideline as well as someone sitting 9 feet up in a chair...
Here are some things I've learned over the years about coaches and their eyesight opinions:
* The beauty is in the eye of the beholder and they all think they have perfect eyesight.
* Officials are blind and can see nothing.
* Officials are biased against them and are biased in their calls.
* They can stand at the net post and clearly see the far sideline and far corner of the baseline without error or question.
* Officials are making the call because they are afraid of the opposing coach.
* The officials were paid to make bad calls.
* The official is dating one of the players and are making calls to benefit them.
* Lots of coaches have friends and relatives in the stands who are always truthful in how they see the ball and are more than willing to help the official officiate.
* According to one coach, the official was making bad calls on his player because he didn't like Russians.
* The coach is arguing the call simply to motivate his own player. He knew the ball was out all the time but didn't want to admit it.
* As one coach said, "I can see all 6 courts at one time and I never miss a call."
Here are some things that are TRUE about making line calls:
* Noone is 100% right all the time.
* Some officials are not very good at making line calls and that will never change.
* Just like some coaches suck at their jobs, some officials do too.
* The person in the chair can see the court better than a person standing or sitting on the sideline.
* Officials are to overrule only when there is a "clear and obvious" error.
* Officials are human and can make mistakes. Coaches and players are the same by the way...
* Any official who changes their call because the coach rants and raves won't be an official for long.
* Officials should treat all coaches with the respect and honor they are due.
* A coach has no right to verbally abuse an official over a line call.
* A coach should always treat an official with respect as another human being.
* A coach should never call into question an official's race, intellect, abilities, biases, sexual orientation, or anything that demeans them as a human being.
Overall, I would say that 99.9% of all coaches are fine, upstanding people doing a great job in a very difficult position. As one coach said, "Can you imagine having your future being held in the hands of a 19 year old?"
Its the .1% that make our life difficult from time to time...
5 comments:
you forgot the coaches who sit to the side of the chair and look thru the chair and can see the baseline call better than the chair who is unobstructed from up high.
One time I was standing outside a court with two coaches looking directly down the long line of a match. A ball was hit down that sideline and I asked both coaches how they saw it--one said it was obviously good and the other said it was obviously out.
And there you have it... Perfect vision by two coaches at the same time.
PlaySight fixes all those problems. Can't wait for the Sooners to install it so our favorite coach won't have to go review the GoPro tapes to tell us how bad we are.
Here's another subject. I wonder what the 18 officials pigeon-holed for the Baylor regionals are going to do now? I guess they can always travel up to Arkansas. I'll put them on my list.
Arkansas needs some wins first to get that regional :)
Post a Comment